englertlaw.com

  • Home
  • About
  • Practice Areas
    • Property Tax Appeals
    • Property Tax Exemptions
    • Appellate Advocacy
    • Residential Real Estate Transactions
  • Law Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
  • Practice Areas
    • Property Tax Appeals
    • Property Tax Exemptions
    • Appellate Advocacy
    • Residential Real Estate Transactions
  • Law Blog
  • Contact Us

LAW BLOG

A busy week in New Jersey Tax Court - Part 2

1/19/2021

0 Comments

 
Our second installment from the Tax Court's busy first week of 2021 is a twist on an exemption opinion penned by Presiding Tax Court Judge Mala Sundar, P.J.T.C. The case, Township of Freehold v. Centrastate Healthcare Services, Inc., Nos. 000047-2016 & 000048-2016 (Tax Court January 5, 2021) marks further fallout from the Tax Court's opinion in AHS Hospital v. Morristown, 28 N.J. Tax 456 (Tax 2015), though this time falling in the favor of the taxpayer. Let's dig in a little to this one. 

First, a bit of history. The subject property was transferred to a for-profit entity in 2008, though still used as a clinic for indigent patients. The municipality filed an appeal from the "failure to impose" an omitted assessment for 2014 and 2015. The municipality initially moved for summary judgment on the grounds that a for-profit entity was not eligible for a tax exemption. The Tax Court initially denied that motion, and then later granted it, leaving open the issue of valuation for trial. After a change in counsel, the taxpayer moved for reconsideration of the grant of partial summary judgment rescinding the exemption on the grounds that the Tax Court's decision in another hospital exemption case mandated a dismissal, namely Borough of Red Bank v. RMC-Meridian Health, 30 N.J. Tax 551 (Tax), motion for leave to appeal den., 238 N.J. 455 (2019). In that case, the Tax Court found that a similar municipal appeal had to be dismissed, as the court lacked jurisdiction to consider the appeals. The court held that the municipality should have filed an appeal under N.J.S.A. 54:3-21 from the original assessment, and not from a failure to impose an omitted assessment. 

With that background, the outcome of the case was straightforward. Because the statute for the termination of an exemption requires the omitted assessment to be imposed in the year that the change prompting the termination occurs, the court found that there was no basis for reliance upon the standard omitted assessment procedure in a subsequent year. Rather, since the exemption had been granted for that tax year, there was no other change at the property and the township had not filed a timely appeal, the taxpayer was entitled to rely on that exemption. Since the valuation claims could also not survive, the Tax Court directed the entry of judgment dismissing the appeals with prejudice. 
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Kevin Englert
    Owner

    Archives

    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    April 2020
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    July 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017

    Categories

    All
    County Tax Board Appeal
    Tax Appeal Deadline
    Tax Assessment

    RSS Feed

Site powered by Weebly. Managed by SiteGround